Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for August, 2009

Is Your Company Courageous?

Friday, August 28th, 2009

By William Seidman

What creates courage? I go back to the work of Ron Riggio on transformational leadership. Commitment to a greater social good seems to be one of the keys to acting with courage.

Think about some of your favorite companies or people. Do they act courageously? The odds are good that they aren’t doing the same old safe thing year after year.

When you can get people to see something worthwhile that is beyond themselves they’ll take risks that might seem a little crazy - but that are brave.

More than ever, organizations need to be courageous. Can you honestly say that yours is?

Why Cowardly Lions Make Poor Leaders: Teaching Courage

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

By William Seidman

I’ve been asked to help develop a “change leadership” program. This seemed strange; so much is written about leadership and there are so many training and coaching programs. Why create a new one?

A new program may be essential because (1) most leadership programs are not specifically about leading through change and (2) most leadership programs don’t have enough impact.

I asked my network of friends, including many who teach leadership and are executive coaches, How could so much have been spent on leadership development and coaching and yet most organizations still have dismal leadership?

It’s not so puzzling when you know that most training and coaching programs aren’t about real world situations and so don’t apply.

What then is missing?

The answer is:  a focus on being courageous. Leaders must have a confidence and willingness to take risks despite considerable uncertainty and resistance.

How do you teach someone to be courageous?

More on Organizational Change: Attitude Really IS Everything

Monday, August 17th, 2009

By Rick Grbavac

Bringing about - and sustaining - change to any organization requires a series of shifts in thinking and behavior. It also requires people who have great attitudes. There’s little point in wasting time and money - and the goodwill of the people who are on board - trying to convince, cajole, or convert people with attitude problems.

David Fox, Chairman & Chief Executive at PP Business Improvement, part of Power Panels Electrical Systems Ltd, puts it like this:

  • If a business wants to continuously improve its performance and productivity, it needs to start by recruiting the right people with the right attitude.
  • Traditional training is not the answer.
  • Training should not be considered a cost but an investment.
  • The attitudes and values need to be embraced by the entire enterprise, not just isolated pockets of individuals.
  • You can’t simply throw lots of money at improving business performance without first dealing with the people issues.

There’s really no better way to express it. Attitude IS everything!

Why There’s No Twitter Version of Successful Leadership

Monday, August 10th, 2009

By William Seidman

More on the issue of instant gratification versus “grit”: determination and consistent hard work:

Recently I was working with a VP of sales who wanted to train his 11 regional vice-presidents (RVPs)  how to lead through a significant change initiative.

The regional VPs had mixed feelings: they were under real and immediate pressure to make their numbers,  and recognized that leadership couldn’t happen without grit.

I asked them if they thought there was a Twitter version of leadership — 140 characters and instant leader. They laughed and realized that - like so many things worth doing - this was a long-term project.

But one of my colleagues thinks we should simply give up and stop trying to get people to move beyond instant gratification.

What do you think?

Grit, Determination, Persistence: The Value of Long-Term Effort in Developing Talent

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

By Rick Grbavac

An article by science and tech writer Jonah Lehrer in the online Boston Globe describes studies that point to the fact that grit and perseverance are better predictors of success than intelligence.  I found it interesting that, because IQ is relatively quick and easy to identify, researchers focused their attention on raising IQ and disregarded focusing on values of long-term development of talent.

Carol S. Dweck, psychologist at Stanford University, has said, ” One of the most important elements is teaching kids that talent takes time to develop, and requires continuous effort.” She refers to this as a “growth mindset.” Dweck compares this view with the “fixed mindset,” the belief that achievement results from abilities we are born with. “A child with the fixed mindset is much more likely to give up when they encounter a challenging obstacle, like algebra, since they assume that they’re just not up to the task,” says Dweck.

“..talent takes time to develop, and requires continuous effort.” If you want to develop the high-performing organization, it is not done with the fire hose approach.  It takes some time to develop the skills, grit and determination to be successful.

Lehrer goes on to say that praise for determination, trying, effort and grit are much better in the long run rather than praising for intelligence.  This research has great relevance for our education system and for our business talent development.  It also supports Cerebyte’s drip approach to becoming great at just about anything.

Sustaining Organizational Change and Change Initiatives

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

By William Seidman

Sustaining the organizational change that your company or group has spent a lot of time and money to implement can be really tough. Many years ago at HP, a first-level manager talked to me about how hard it was to keep the business running while learning a new business process. He was echoing the complaints from his group.

His manager, who was also my manager,  sat him down and asked him a question: “Are you a manager?”

My colleague answered, “Yes.”

Our manager then had a very simple response: “Then manage it!”

The first thing the organization needs to do, from the top executive down, is to actually expect people to find a way to manage the situation. The second thing is to give people some training in how to lead an organization through a change.

This training usually has two parts:

Authentic Commitment,  a belief in the usefulness and validity of the change 

Continuous Demonstration of Tangible Support, in which the manager is taught how to walk the talk of the change

Additionally, managers need to be held explicitly accountable, with both rewards for effectively managing and penalties for focusing merely on keeping the business running.

Obviously, if the executive team is less than actively supportive of the change and of the ways and means to sustain it,  the organization cannot improve.

Sustaining Change When Your Managers and Supervisors are Pedaling as Fast as They Can

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

 By William Seidman

Sustaining a change to a large organization can be difficult.

At Cerebyte we’ve made great progress in getting the end-user (the sales person, service person, etc.) to buy into and want the change. The problems arise with immediate and second-level supervisors. Without their active support, changes can’t “stick.” So what’s their problem? I see two factors:

1.  Managers are so focused on keeping the business running that looking ahead at the several weeks — or, more often,  the several months — often required for a substantive change is not something they do.  Nearly all of their resources, and most of the resources they supervise,  are just about daily survival.

2. They’re usually untrained in balancing the demands of running the business each day with developing their organization for the future.

Change initiatives only rarely survive these persistent obstacles.

 
Better Tag Cloud