Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for the ‘best practices’ Category

Take the Guesswork Out of New Hire Success

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

By William Seidman

New hire success is essential to an organization, and needn’t be a “fingers crossed” process. A single and unified experience, which we at Cerebyte have developed – and use in the real world – ensures success. Our model has four key parts:

  1. Set the Bar for the New Hire
  2. Motivate the New Hire
  3. Sustain the New Hire’s Learning
  4. Scale for Rapid Growth

The order of these experiences is a significant departure from other training approaches. Most classes and OJT training jump straight to functional knowledge, focusing on the mechanics of the job without enough real context.  Instead, we use your positive deviants to help create context and understanding of the new hire’s role.

Begin by Setting the Bar:

Your proven, identified experts, your positive deviants,  can define the content, the best sequence, and approach for learning the material for any new hire.  Ask your positive deviants:

  • In a classroom, what would you teach someone about being a great new hire?
  • What of this would you have a manager or coach reinforce immediately after the class?
  • What additional, higher-order learning would you want the coaches to teach once the basics are established?

The results of this process, which usually takes between one and three days, are incredibly consistent, regardless of the industry. The classroom environment includes connecting the new hire’s role to the larger purpose of the organization, basic background information, and basic process and procedural information. You want your new hire to have a solid theoretical foundation for doing the job well. The OJT (on the job) portions take that theoretical foundation and systematically ensure that learning is applied, leading to an employee who, despite lacking experience with your organization, has excellent capabilities.

I’ll be describe the rest of the process: motivating, sustaining, and scaling for growth, here in the coming days.

Maximize the Value of New Hires

Monday, August 30th, 2010

By William Seidman

Recent scientific breakthroughs have led to the development of a methodology and supporting technology that increase new hire program effectiveness by both improving the quality of the learning experiences and enabling easy integration of the best of the classroom and mentoring experience. This approach is proven, with significant impacts such as:

• Reduced ramp-up time of new sales people from 4 months to 4 weeks

• Reduced ramp-up time for manufacturing floor engineers from 24 months to 8 months.

Seem far-fetched or too good to be true? It’s not.

Paradigms for New Hire Development:

Most new hire programs rely on either intense, classroom-based training or ad hoc on-the-job mentoring (OJT). Both approaches have some strengths, but also significant weaknesses.

The primary advantage of intensive new hire classroom training is that it occurs in a controlled environment where the organization can determine what the new hire experiences, when they experience it and how they experience it. Unfortunately, many new hire training classes simply provide too much information, too quickly and with too little context and application to be effective

OJT mentoring programs, on the other hand, are all about learning through observation of colleagues’ performance, discussion of key functions and supported practice. The new hire gets to experience, at least for a period of time, what the work actually demands. But, OJT experiences are often quite random and the learnings derived from the experiences are completely dependent on the effectiveness of the mentor. Unstructured OJT may be more engaging, but it is not a particularly reliable means of ensuring that new hires have the attitudes, knowledge and skills they need to ultimately succeed.

A few organizations try to use these two approaches together by providing classroom training followed by supported OJT. This too has faltered because too often the class is still overwhelming and the hand-off to the coach is unstructured, leaving the coach to determine what the reinforcing experiences will be. Integrated Class and OJT

Recent studies have shown that the key to ultimate new hire success is not in simply using these approaches together, but instead by integrating them into a single, unified experience. Breakthroughs in four areas – positive deviance, fair process, neuroscience and mass customization — plus the emergence of “persuasive technology” have led to the development of a methodology that effectively integrates new hire training classes and high impact OJT support. More specifically, the model has 4 key parts, which I’ll be talking about next.

Kotter’s 8 Steps to Real and Lasting Organizational Change

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

By William Seidman

It’s amazing to me how much insight into today’s organizations’ problems retired Harvard professor John Kotter had nearly fifteen years ago, when he published “Leading Change: Why Transformational Efforts Fail.” Looked at it another way – how little things have changed.  One of Kotter’s most important points is that transformation is a process, not an event.

Kotter lists the biggest errors organizations make, and then the antidotes – his 8 steps to successful change.

  1. Create urgency
  2. Form a powerful guiding coalition
  3. Create a vision for change
  4. Communicate the vision
  5. Empower others to act on the vision by removing obstacles
  6. Create short-term wins
  7. Don’t declare victory too early; build on the change
  8. Anchor the changes in corporate culture

We’re very much in line with Kotter’s approach, and benefit from the addition of recent breakthroughs in the neuroscience of learning. The leaders we work with understand these now-classic 8 Steps to Change,  but managers have a harder time with them.  It’s our challenge to convey the importance of each step.

The Difference Between Management and Leadership

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

By William Seidman

John Kotter’s now-classic article, “What Leaders Really Do,” was published by the Harvard Business Review some years ago. Its message rang true then, and it does today. Kotter makes the distinction between leadership and management: leadership is about guiding an organization through change. Management, on the other hand, is about facilitating and inspiring the daily efficient execution of the change. Organizations need both but, in a misguided effort, spend most of their time and energy on management. The need for great leadership, and for support of great leaders, is often given short shrift.

At Cerebyte we’ve noticed a decline in leadership during the recession – as if people are fearful of making a change, and so are almost hiding.  As understandable as this response might be, it’s of little use to organizations; in fact it dooms them.

Our work seeks to support and reinforce leadership so that, during this recession and beyond it, companies and organizations can thrive.

High Performance: Attain it Quickly, Sustain it Confidently

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

By William Seidman

Here’s more from Robert Morris’s interview with me. In this section we discuss my book and just why high performance is so important today.

Morris: Now please focus on Strategy in Action in 10 Days, co-authored with Mike McCauley. For those who have not as yet read it, you explain why high performance is no longer a competitive advantage, it is a necessity. I agree. Based on your own experience with Cerebyte as well as on what you have observed in other companies, how can it be achieved in only ten days?

Seidman: We didn’t think it could happen that fast until a client actually did a significant transformation in only 6 days. We added 4 more days as buffer, because no one would believe us anyway! It only takes 3 days in our Wisdom Discovery workshop working with 6-8 positive deviants to create any best practice, even in areas that are new and uncertain. It takes another 2-3 days to make the content production ready and load it into the persuasive technology. It takes another day to train the “coaches” to support the learning process, and the next day, the best practices can be deployed.

Because of the way the combination of positive deviant wisdom, coaching and persuasive technology work, there is typically an attitudinal change in a matter of minutes and substantive change in just a few days. If the change is big and complex, it may take several months for it to be completely implemented, but visible movement happens almost immediately.

Morris: Here’s a follow-up question. Once high performance has been achieved, how to sustain it?

Seidman: Sustainability is one of the biggest problems with any change initiative. Fortunately, recent advances in the neuroscience of learning tell us how to sustain a change, and we have engineered this into our process and technology. In simple terms, to sustain a change, an individual and an organization must practice the new capabilities long enough and intensely enough for it to be internalized both at the level of neural function for each person and business processes in the organization.

There is a little bit of an art form to getting the practice right though. It requires both mental and application exercises that typically take about 15-30 minutes per day to complete; the exercises need to continue for about 10 weeks. There is a barrier at six weeks when the new capabilities have emerged enough to be disruptive but the old ones are still present, creating a conflict. This barrier goes away with more practice. Once people reach the 10-week mark, the change is usually sustainable, though they may have to practice additional skills to reach the complete desired outcome.

Transform New Hires into Valuable Team Members

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

By William Seidman

Good leaders and managers know that their ability to bring in — and quickly ramp up — new hires is critical for sustained success.  In an economic downturn, efficient and effective new hire development is especially important.  At Cerebyte we have an alternative to the usual methods of either an intense “fire hose” training class or some sort of on the job (OJT) mentoring.

Why did we search for a new method? Because fire hose training gives too much too fast without sufficient context, and on the job training is too random and relies too much on people gleaning meaning from observed actions.

At Cerebyte we’ve developed a process that creates a great blend specifically for new hire development. We’ve tested it and seen it work for our clients. How do we do this?

Based on the expertise of an organization’s positive deviants, we first develop a set of big steps that are coached during a brief and focused classroom setting.

Our persuasive technology provides the class structure; the specific learning activities are led by a facilitator.

The organization’s positive deviants also give us the key items that the manager needs to reinforce. This shows up as a transitional “big step” in the technology and usually 2-4 steps of learning — structured  on the job training —  that drive to greater depth and application.

It takes about three days to create the entire program. The results have been spectacular, cutting ramp-up times by 50% or more, and increasing leaders’ and team members’ stated satisfaction in the training process.

How to Set the Bar for Better Performance in Your Organization

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

By William Seidman

Positive deviants model the ethical attitudes and best practices that others should achieve. They are the primary creators and preservers of an organization’s ethics. These individuals are motivated by a commitment to create a “social good” for their customers and for their organization: they are the ideal candidates to set the bar within your company’s culture.

Use your organization’s positive deviants to establish a clear, specific standard of ethical values, attitudes and behaviors. This is one of the most effective ways you can create change in your organization.

In this video I explain how to set the bar to create a useful picture of the results you want:

Leaders and Managers, Change Initiatives, and Learning from the Exit Interview : More Questions from Robert Morris

Monday, July 26th, 2010

By William Seidman

Several weeks ago Robert Morris interviewed me at length for the “First Friday Book Synopsis,” and I’ve been sharing parts of that interview here. Today: developing effective leaders and managers, how to lead change initiatives that “stick,” and the useful truths that sometimes emerge during the exit interview.


Morris: At Cerebyte, how are effective leaders and managers developed at all levels and in all areas?


Seidman: We use our Wisdom Discovery process with “positive deviants” (or star employees) from several organizations to define what it means to be a great leader and how to become this type of leader. These best practices are put into our persuasive technology to guide users through a series of learning activities that develop their leadership capabilities. It is just amazing to watch how people grow in these programs. They speak differently, act differently and even stand with more confidence. It is a great feeling to help people move into the leadership realm.

Morris: Most change initiatives either fail or fall far short of original expectations. In your opinion, what are the most formidable behaviors to change and how best to overcome them?

Seidman: The single biggest barrier to change is revealed when an organization’s leadership is insufficiently committed to the change, to seeing it through to success. Many executives seem to want the benefit of a change without being willing to do the work required or handle the resistance. This shows up generally in an organization’s unwillingness to allocate the time and resources required to learn the new capabilities, and most acutely, at the end of a quarter when there are financial pressures and all change initiatives are dropped to make the numbers. In our terminology, transactional pressures undermine transformational initiatives. In most people’s language, the change is just a “fad of the week.” There just isn’t a twitter version of change or performance improvement, no matter how much people want one.


Morris: During exit interviews of highly-valued employees who have accepted a position elsewhere, most of the reasons for leaving are associated with their supervisor. In your opinion, how best to respond to quite legitimate complaints?


Seidman: The best way to fix any turnover problem caused by supervisors is to improve the supervisors’ leadership capabilities. Using our approach, even in very high turnover environments such as fast food, turnover drops drastically and satisfaction with management increases. This happens because we separate the supervisor’s role as content expert from their role as supportive leader. In most cases, supervisors don’t know when they should be telling someone something versus encouraging exploration and growth. As a result, supervisors increasingly become “tellers” of information, which turns out to be very dictatorial and discouraging for employees.
By having the expert knowledge supplied from the positive deviants and provided through the persuasive technology, we can reduce the load on the supervisor, enabling them to learn a few — very focused and effective — support tools. We also help the supervisor become consistently more transformational by guiding them to be more effective at understanding and managing the conflict between their daily transactional role that tends to drive employees away and the transformational role that tends to grow employee loyalty.

Answering Some Thoughtful Questions from Management Consultant Robert Morris

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

By William Seidman

I was recently interviewed by management consultant Robert Morris. Our conversation was posted on the  First Friday Book Synopsis,  part of ”The Employee Engagement Network.” I’ll be sharing some of the highlights (some edited for brevity) here.

Today: What I know now that I wish I’d known when I founded Cerebyte, the major challenges our clients face, and the difference between leadership and management..

Morris: What do you know now that you wish you had known when you founded Cerebyte?

Seidman: Our most valuable insight is this: how hard it is to establish an innovative product and process even if everyone says they want it and even if it has incredibly strong proof points to support it. More specifically, we thought there would be an openness to innovation in the area of performance improvement because almost every organization talked about the need to improve performance and there was widespread agreement about the ineffectiveness of the available approaches (e.g. training classes) at improving performance. However, there was actually a tremendous amount of resistance to change, even if everyone thought it was a good thing to do. It was only when the science actually caught up with what we had been doing, and became widely accepted that the resistance to change decreased.

Morris: Although there is great diversity among Cerebyte clients, in terms of both size and nature of business, which major challenge do all of them face? How specifically does Cerebyte help them to respond effectively to that challenge?

Seidman: They are serious about making the changes in their organization required to significantly improve performance, usually in a particular focus area. In many cases, it is a “change or die” situation for them so motivation and disillusionment with traditional approaches are high. We help organizations improve performance, faster, more completely, more predictably and at less expense than has previously been possible.

Morris: Do you differentiate leadership from management?

Seidman: Yes, though primarily in the leadership programs we develop for our customers. To us, leadership is much more about creating a compelling vision and providing the support and resources that enable the team to achieve the vision (in our terminology, it is about guiding “transformation”) while management is much more about the administration of the business (i.e. “transactions”). We find that this difference is most important when there are significant challenges to the organization. Managers retreat from performance improvements to a survival mode – Did I make my numbers today? -whereas leaders look at the challenges as an opportunity to drive the organization forward, even if it means taking some significant risks.

In addition, we know that “operational excellence,” which is the focus of management, is a subset of leadership —  so if you have great leadership, you get the best of both worlds. It doesn’t work the other way though. Managers, even good ones, literally think differently than great leaders and need extensive education to become leaders.

Four Steps to a More Ethical Organization

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Ethix is an excellent online publication of the Center for Integrity in Business in the School of Business and Economics at Seattle Pacific University. The magazine’s editors provide illustrations of business ethics challenges through positive examples of best practices and exemplary leadership.

We were delighted to share our ideas on creating ethical organizations with readers of “Ethix,” in which our article recently appeared:

FOUR STEPS TO A MORE ETHICAL ORGANIZATION

By William Seidman and Michael McCauley

Do you consider your organization to be ethical? Many organizations have a moral foundation that enables them to make ethically sound decisions even when faced with adverse short-term consequences. However, as has recently been seen on Wall Street and in other places (e.g., Toyota) too many organizations are quick to put immediate economic gain before ethics. While the unethical actions may be expedient, they ultimately contaminate both the employees and the organization. Maintaining high ethical standards is the only way to produce sustainable success.

Do you want your organization to be consistently ethical? Using recent scientific breakthroughs, it is now possible to efficiently enhance the ethics of almost any organization. A simple process of setting a goal and then motivating, sustaining, and scaling ethical behaviors has produced numerous success stories like these:
• Pharmacy managers in a large retail chain think of themselves as “a critical part of the family emergency response system,” going out of their way to ensure that their patients get the correct medicines and care (instead of just selling prescriptions).

• Sales people in an advertising firm that serves small and medium businesses see themselves as “helping customers achieve their personal life goals” (instead of just selling advertising).

So how can an organization create the ethical foundation that inspires this type of response?

1. Set the Bar
First, use your organization’s “positive deviants” to establish a clear, specific standard of ethical values, attitudes and behaviors. Positive deviants are highly respected individuals who are consistent top performers and can typically be identified simply by asking management who stands out. They model the ideal ethical attitudes and best practices all others should achieve and are therefore the primary creators and preservers of an organization’s ethics. Positive deviants are motivated by a commitment to ethically creating a “social good” for their customers and for their organization.

2. Motivate Ethics
Second, guide all personnel to firmly embrace the goal of ethically achieving the positive deviant’s social good. When a positive deviant’s social good, or the inspiration behind their work, is presented to others in an empowering manner, it can be contagious for an organization. It naturally and organically spreads the commitment to the social good, and its ethical foundation, quickly and efficiently.

More specifically, once a strong understanding of the positive deviants’ social good has been established, it can be packaged into a short, emotionally powerful statement that excites and empowers other employees. To be successful, the social good must be presented in a way that creates a sense of honor and dignity (i.e., fair process). It must also cause people to naturally visualize themselves as having the same personal standards and commitment as the positive deviants (i.e., positive visualization). When these occur, people quickly embrace the positive deviants’ perspectives, improving the ethics of the entire organization.

3. Sustain Ethics
Next, ensure that the commitment to ethics is sustainable, even in the face of contrary pressures. True ethical behavior is profound and long term. It is a way of doing business that is so engrained in the organization that people cannot imagine functioning any other way.
The most effective means of generating this depth of commitment comes from the neuroscience principle “neurons that fire together wire together.” All profound learning is a change to the underlying neural structure of the brain that occurs when neurons fire together around consistent concepts. If the concepts are focused around the positive deviant ethics, new learning occurs that can be so complete that people do not even recognize they were ever any other way.

What makes neurons fire together? The key to achieve this organizational depth is simple — practice, practice, practice. Everything the organization does needs to exercise and reinforce the mental commitment to ethics.

4. Scale Ethics
Finally, engage a critical mass of the organization quickly to ensure that ethics pervades all aspects of the organization and becomes a true reflection of the organization as a whole. At the same time, individuals must display ethical behaviors in ways that are unique to their function and personality.

Persuasive technology — technology designed to “change what people believe and do” — that incorporates the principle of mass customization can facilitate widespread commitment to an organization’s ethics. Because this type of technology can touch many people simultaneously, individuals function more ethically and the organization as a whole builds a lasting foundation for ethical behavior.

Contributing to Success
The notion of an ethical organization may seem abstract, yet people who work in an organization with healthy ethics absolutely know it. They love their work, and they ultimately create better, more successful institutions.

 
Better Tag Cloud