Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for the ‘organizational culture’ Category

Take the Guesswork Out of New Hire Success

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

By William Seidman

New hire success is essential to an organization, and needn’t be a “fingers crossed” process. A single and unified experience, which we at Cerebyte have developed – and use in the real world – ensures success. Our model has four key parts:

  1. Set the Bar for the New Hire
  2. Motivate the New Hire
  3. Sustain the New Hire’s Learning
  4. Scale for Rapid Growth

The order of these experiences is a significant departure from other training approaches. Most classes and OJT training jump straight to functional knowledge, focusing on the mechanics of the job without enough real context.  Instead, we use your positive deviants to help create context and understanding of the new hire’s role.

Begin by Setting the Bar:

Your proven, identified experts, your positive deviants,  can define the content, the best sequence, and approach for learning the material for any new hire.  Ask your positive deviants:

  • In a classroom, what would you teach someone about being a great new hire?
  • What of this would you have a manager or coach reinforce immediately after the class?
  • What additional, higher-order learning would you want the coaches to teach once the basics are established?

The results of this process, which usually takes between one and three days, are incredibly consistent, regardless of the industry. The classroom environment includes connecting the new hire’s role to the larger purpose of the organization, basic background information, and basic process and procedural information. You want your new hire to have a solid theoretical foundation for doing the job well. The OJT (on the job) portions take that theoretical foundation and systematically ensure that learning is applied, leading to an employee who, despite lacking experience with your organization, has excellent capabilities.

I’ll be describe the rest of the process: motivating, sustaining, and scaling for growth, here in the coming days.

Kotter’s 8 Steps to Real and Lasting Organizational Change

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

By William Seidman

It’s amazing to me how much insight into today’s organizations’ problems retired Harvard professor John Kotter had nearly fifteen years ago, when he published “Leading Change: Why Transformational Efforts Fail.” Looked at it another way – how little things have changed.  One of Kotter’s most important points is that transformation is a process, not an event.

Kotter lists the biggest errors organizations make, and then the antidotes – his 8 steps to successful change.

  1. Create urgency
  2. Form a powerful guiding coalition
  3. Create a vision for change
  4. Communicate the vision
  5. Empower others to act on the vision by removing obstacles
  6. Create short-term wins
  7. Don’t declare victory too early; build on the change
  8. Anchor the changes in corporate culture

We’re very much in line with Kotter’s approach, and benefit from the addition of recent breakthroughs in the neuroscience of learning. The leaders we work with understand these now-classic 8 Steps to Change,  but managers have a harder time with them.  It’s our challenge to convey the importance of each step.

How to Set the Bar for Better Performance in Your Organization

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

By William Seidman

Positive deviants model the ethical attitudes and best practices that others should achieve. They are the primary creators and preservers of an organization’s ethics. These individuals are motivated by a commitment to create a “social good” for their customers and for their organization: they are the ideal candidates to set the bar within your company’s culture.

Use your organization’s positive deviants to establish a clear, specific standard of ethical values, attitudes and behaviors. This is one of the most effective ways you can create change in your organization.

In this video I explain how to set the bar to create a useful picture of the results you want:

Answering Some Thoughtful Questions from Management Consultant Robert Morris

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

By William Seidman

I was recently interviewed by management consultant Robert Morris. Our conversation was posted on the  First Friday Book Synopsis,  part of ”The Employee Engagement Network.” I’ll be sharing some of the highlights (some edited for brevity) here.

Today: What I know now that I wish I’d known when I founded Cerebyte, the major challenges our clients face, and the difference between leadership and management..

Morris: What do you know now that you wish you had known when you founded Cerebyte?

Seidman: Our most valuable insight is this: how hard it is to establish an innovative product and process even if everyone says they want it and even if it has incredibly strong proof points to support it. More specifically, we thought there would be an openness to innovation in the area of performance improvement because almost every organization talked about the need to improve performance and there was widespread agreement about the ineffectiveness of the available approaches (e.g. training classes) at improving performance. However, there was actually a tremendous amount of resistance to change, even if everyone thought it was a good thing to do. It was only when the science actually caught up with what we had been doing, and became widely accepted that the resistance to change decreased.

Morris: Although there is great diversity among Cerebyte clients, in terms of both size and nature of business, which major challenge do all of them face? How specifically does Cerebyte help them to respond effectively to that challenge?

Seidman: They are serious about making the changes in their organization required to significantly improve performance, usually in a particular focus area. In many cases, it is a “change or die” situation for them so motivation and disillusionment with traditional approaches are high. We help organizations improve performance, faster, more completely, more predictably and at less expense than has previously been possible.

Morris: Do you differentiate leadership from management?

Seidman: Yes, though primarily in the leadership programs we develop for our customers. To us, leadership is much more about creating a compelling vision and providing the support and resources that enable the team to achieve the vision (in our terminology, it is about guiding “transformation”) while management is much more about the administration of the business (i.e. “transactions”). We find that this difference is most important when there are significant challenges to the organization. Managers retreat from performance improvements to a survival mode – Did I make my numbers today? -whereas leaders look at the challenges as an opportunity to drive the organization forward, even if it means taking some significant risks.

In addition, we know that “operational excellence,” which is the focus of management, is a subset of leadership —  so if you have great leadership, you get the best of both worlds. It doesn’t work the other way though. Managers, even good ones, literally think differently than great leaders and need extensive education to become leaders.

Are Your Managers Planning, or Are They Pedaling as Fast as They Can? Think Again.

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

By William Seidman

 

I’ve recently read two very good books: The Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton Christensen and and The Knowing-Doing Gap by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert Sutton.

 

Christensen and Pfeffer and Sutton each tell the truth about what happens when organizations try to change – and why it is so hard to change.

 

Christensen describes how institutions develop infrastructure that is focused, to the exclusion of all else, on today,  emphasizing current issues over planning for the future. These hidden biases and barriers to thinking ahead tend to be the factors that most undermine change.

 

It makes sense that a company’s daily pressures to make short-term numbers demand quick action, and that this be done in ways that have worked before.  But it doesn’t help with tomorrow’s challenges — not one bit.

 

Vitally important changes are all but impossible to accomplish when managers are preoccupied with filling orders regardless of what might lie ahead.  I think of the bumper sticker I used to see, “DON’T HONK. I’M PEDALING AS FAST AS I CAN!”

Pfeffer and Sutton take this idea a step farther,  showing how management teams know about these issues and even know what they should do —  but don’t do it because, again,  of pressure to satisfy immediate needs.

 

An exasperated colleague said to me the other day, “Sometimes you just want to shake people!”

 

We try to break down these barriers by using existing leadership and showing, convincingly, that there’s a lot more to sustained success than “pedaling as fast as you can.”

 

What Motivates Us? Some Surprises about Money — and Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

By Rick Grbavac

Watch this great little film by RSA Animate, adapted from a talk given by Daniel Pink, author of Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us.  Pink’s point is that our previous ideas about what motivates people to greatness are only partially correct.  If performance involves mechanical tasks, more money does work to improve performance.  But as soon as there is any cognitive skill involved, more money as incentive actually works in reverse. 

Three factors lead to better performance: Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose.  Giving people a chance to be responsible and perform their jobs without undue oversight is the first factor to enabling people to seek better performance.  People enjoy a challenge; when given an opportunity to improve their performance in a way that increases their self respect, they are willing and able to improve.  Finally,  people want to make a difference.  If they feel that their jobs have a higher purpose, they enjoy their work more and perform at a higher level. 

These three factors are closely related to the qualities of the positive deviants in your organization.  PDs tend to operate without much management support (or interference).  They consistently look to improve their skills and capabilities. And they conceive of their jobs in higher moral terms, causing them to do different and more successful things.

Factors for motivation = the qualities of positive deviants.  Every manager’s dream is to have a self-directed, motivated workforce.  This is what we do with our clients.

Steps to Courageous Leadership

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

By William Seidman

What are we really recommending when we talk to executives about “courageous leadership”?

Commit to a vision. Believe in your vision  — and the fact that it will require some disruption to achieve –in order to get others to commit to it.  Courageous executives have the courage of their own convictions.

Try new approaches and new ideas. Have the courage to actually allocate resources to learning and becoming good at the new idea. There’s often huge pressure to continue to do the old thing. Willingness to push toward an often undefined outcome is essential to my definition of “courage.”

Wholeheartedly pursue the goal. It’s human nature to fear change. Someone in your organization is likely to resist, and we’ve seen many executives abandon their initiatives as soon as anyone pushes back. This isn’t conviction! Persistence in the face of resistance is essential.

Combine these attributes and you have a courageous, forward-looking executive leading an organization that’s likely to vastly outperform the competition.

Success at ISPI — International Society for Performance Improvement

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

By William Seidman

April 19th-22nd,  Cerebyte went to San Francisco to participate in ISPI‘s annual conference: a great meeting with attendance up about 50%. The energy was terrific. We contributed two sessions: a 90-minute one on Persuasive Technology, which packed the room and had everyone staying — unusual for ISPI.

ISPI has a fun tradition they call Bagel Barrel (aka Cracker Barrel) - three 20-minute high-energy expert-hosted roundtable discussions.  We hosted “Leading the Courageous Organization.”  Our focus was on the four areas of courage that executives need to lead a change:

  • Commitment to change
  • Willingness to try something new
  • Allocation of resources to the new thing
  • Follow-up

Participation was fantastic and we had a lot of fun.

Having said that, we missed some of our colleagues from last time who couldn’t attend our session this year,  including Sarah Ward, Jon Revelos, Molly Wankel and Paul Neiminen. Hope to see all of you next year!

Band-Aids are Quick but Are They Enough?

Monday, April 12th, 2010

 By William Seidman

I recently worked with a management team that was in extreme pain. They wanted immediate relief.  I got them to admit that it had taken several years to create this painful situation.

It’s human nature to hope that a workshop and a simple prescription — a piece of new software or a brief training — will heal everything. Sometimes I’m asked for a redesign of an entire business process.

But I often find that what is actually wanted is some analysis and some conclusions that justify moving the problem from the suffering team to either another one, or … anywhere else!

When revenue targets are fixed, headcount and other costs are declining, and the core of the business process is dependent on unreliable software, the math won’t work, and neither will the logic.

There is an out though. It is to step back and do a deep redesign based on these parameters. That’s what  we proposed. It’s not lightning-fast, though, and the team wanted something quicker-acting.

They decided that, rather than really repairing some deep damage, that they’d do some shuffling of the pain and hope it solves the problem. My prediction is that they will be back talking to us again in 2 months. The pain will be worse, and now they will have lost 3 months.

It’s a scary way to manage.

ISPI (International Society for Performance Improvement) April Conference

Friday, March 19th, 2010

By William Seidman

The International Society for Performance Improvement  (ISPI) San Francisco  conference is April 19th through the 22nd at the Marriott Marquis.  We’re presenting on  Persuasive Technology  Wednesday, April 21st at 10:30 AM.  The following day, Thursday April 22nd at 8:30 AM, we’ll be talking about the need for Courageous Leadership in Change.   

We went to ISPI last year; it was a great conference and we hope to see you there next month.

 
Better Tag Cloud