Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for the ‘positive deviance’ Category

Transform New Hires into Valuable Team Members

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

By William Seidman

Good leaders and managers know that their ability to bring in — and quickly ramp up — new hires is critical for sustained success.  In an economic downturn, efficient and effective new hire development is especially important.  At Cerebyte we have an alternative to the usual methods of either an intense “fire hose” training class or some sort of on the job (OJT) mentoring.

Why did we search for a new method? Because fire hose training gives too much too fast without sufficient context, and on the job training is too random and relies too much on people gleaning meaning from observed actions.

At Cerebyte we’ve developed a process that creates a great blend specifically for new hire development. We’ve tested it and seen it work for our clients. How do we do this?

Based on the expertise of an organization’s positive deviants, we first develop a set of big steps that are coached during a brief and focused classroom setting.

Our persuasive technology provides the class structure; the specific learning activities are led by a facilitator.

The organization’s positive deviants also give us the key items that the manager needs to reinforce. This shows up as a transitional “big step” in the technology and usually 2-4 steps of learning — structured  on the job training —  that drive to greater depth and application.

It takes about three days to create the entire program. The results have been spectacular, cutting ramp-up times by 50% or more, and increasing leaders’ and team members’ stated satisfaction in the training process.

How to Set the Bar for Better Performance in Your Organization

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

By William Seidman

Positive deviants model the ethical attitudes and best practices that others should achieve. They are the primary creators and preservers of an organization’s ethics. These individuals are motivated by a commitment to create a “social good” for their customers and for their organization: they are the ideal candidates to set the bar within your company’s culture.

Use your organization’s positive deviants to establish a clear, specific standard of ethical values, attitudes and behaviors. This is one of the most effective ways you can create change in your organization.

In this video I explain how to set the bar to create a useful picture of the results you want:

Leaders and Managers, Change Initiatives, and Learning from the Exit Interview : More Questions from Robert Morris

Monday, July 26th, 2010

By William Seidman

Several weeks ago Robert Morris interviewed me at length for the “First Friday Book Synopsis,” and I’ve been sharing parts of that interview here. Today: developing effective leaders and managers, how to lead change initiatives that “stick,” and the useful truths that sometimes emerge during the exit interview.


Morris: At Cerebyte, how are effective leaders and managers developed at all levels and in all areas?


Seidman: We use our Wisdom Discovery process with “positive deviants” (or star employees) from several organizations to define what it means to be a great leader and how to become this type of leader. These best practices are put into our persuasive technology to guide users through a series of learning activities that develop their leadership capabilities. It is just amazing to watch how people grow in these programs. They speak differently, act differently and even stand with more confidence. It is a great feeling to help people move into the leadership realm.

Morris: Most change initiatives either fail or fall far short of original expectations. In your opinion, what are the most formidable behaviors to change and how best to overcome them?

Seidman: The single biggest barrier to change is revealed when an organization’s leadership is insufficiently committed to the change, to seeing it through to success. Many executives seem to want the benefit of a change without being willing to do the work required or handle the resistance. This shows up generally in an organization’s unwillingness to allocate the time and resources required to learn the new capabilities, and most acutely, at the end of a quarter when there are financial pressures and all change initiatives are dropped to make the numbers. In our terminology, transactional pressures undermine transformational initiatives. In most people’s language, the change is just a “fad of the week.” There just isn’t a twitter version of change or performance improvement, no matter how much people want one.


Morris: During exit interviews of highly-valued employees who have accepted a position elsewhere, most of the reasons for leaving are associated with their supervisor. In your opinion, how best to respond to quite legitimate complaints?


Seidman: The best way to fix any turnover problem caused by supervisors is to improve the supervisors’ leadership capabilities. Using our approach, even in very high turnover environments such as fast food, turnover drops drastically and satisfaction with management increases. This happens because we separate the supervisor’s role as content expert from their role as supportive leader. In most cases, supervisors don’t know when they should be telling someone something versus encouraging exploration and growth. As a result, supervisors increasingly become “tellers” of information, which turns out to be very dictatorial and discouraging for employees.
By having the expert knowledge supplied from the positive deviants and provided through the persuasive technology, we can reduce the load on the supervisor, enabling them to learn a few — very focused and effective — support tools. We also help the supervisor become consistently more transformational by guiding them to be more effective at understanding and managing the conflict between their daily transactional role that tends to drive employees away and the transformational role that tends to grow employee loyalty.

Why We’re for Depth and Focus, and How They Engender Success

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

By William Seidman

There’s a two-part series of articles in the online Wall Street Journal of June 5-6. In the first, Clay Shirky asks,  “Does the Internet Make You Smarter?”

The second, by Nicholas Carr, poses the question, “Does the Internet Make You Dumber?”

Clay Shirky argues that the internet makes us smarter by creating new means of learning that will eventually surpass the old – and we all benefit from this.

According to Nicholas Carr,  the internet promotes — even requires — multi-tasking,  which fractures attention, promotes shallow (or little) focus,  and limits learning and sustained, deep thought.

This is relevant to a discussion of persuasive technology.

Recently a trainer asked me about the interface to Cerebyte’s persuasive technology. He compared our interface, which is straightforward and utterly lacking bells and whistles, to more graphically whizzy learning systems.

As I listened to him, I realized that he was accustomed to learning technologies that masked inadequate learning experiences with technical excitement. Anyone with kids can think of dozens of such ”learning toys” which, ultimately, fail at their mission.

It seems that the hook for most learning technologies has to be entertainment more than direct learning because the learning experience they provide is so weak.

So these technologies are much more on the Shirky side of the discussion. Their premise is to give lots of stimulus and hope something sticks.

Our persuasive technology is much more on the Carr side of the discussion. Its job is to encourage and enable depth and focus, not to entertain. We’re committed to this approach because it puts the positive deviant content at the center of the user experience and deliberately fades the technology into the background.

Here is the interesting result:  people like to use our system because it absolutely helps them to create something meaningful and valuable.

The best entertainment — the achievement of success — most definitely does not require batteries!

Protecting Courageous Leadership in Hard Times

Monday, July 5th, 2010

By William Seidman

Over the past few weeks I’ve been working with positive deviants to develop change leadership best practices within their 3 very different organizations.

Each came up with similar answers to hypothetical and real problems, calling on conventional wisdom of vision, resources, and support.

I asked them if they and their colleagues knew these (since they’re conventional wisdom) and they all did.

I followed up with, “Why is there is such a small amount of good leadership if everyone knows the conventional wisdom?”

The consensus was that the conventional wisdom really does work in good times. It’s easy to create a vision and execute it if there is plenty of cash.

The real test of great leadership takes place during bad times, when pressures are severe.

This reminded me of the great Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter’s remarks on the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment’s freedom of speech protection. He wrote that freedom of speech only really matters when the speech to be protected is completely offensive to you.

Speech that doesn’t offend doesn’t need protection; the same is true for leadership. Leadership matters most during the times when it is most difficult to be a leader, when unpopular decisions (whether to risk, for example, current survival for the possibility of a much better future) must be made.  This courageous leadership — which can be tough to sustain in hard times —  is what we work to nurture and protect.

What Do Positive Deviance, Motivation, The Middle-Aged Brain, and Positive Leadership Have to Do with One Another? Plenty

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

By William Seidman


I’m excited about some of the reading I’ve been doing — in diverse areas — because it reinforces some of the most exciting ideas we’ve been talking about for so long, and working on with our clients.

Daniel Pink’s research on motivation, detailed in his book Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us and Barbara Strauch’s findings, reported in her book The Secret Life of the Grown-Up Brain (hear her “Fresh Air” interview here ) combine nicely with what we know about positive deviance and, also, the impact of positive thinking on positive leadership (Kim Cameron’s Positive Leadership: Strategies for Extraordinary Performance to come together in exciting ways.

Positive deviants are invaluable to organizations.  They are rarely found among the youngest, but often among the middle-aged. It’s hardly a coincidence that Barbara Strauch reports — refreshingly — on good studies that show that while processing speed may decline with age, wisdom and a host of other positive human attributes increase in middle age and continue to increase for many years.

Motivation, Pink shows, is key to improving performance.

Cameron shows that positive thinking enables positive leadership, which in turn improves performance.

Organizational performance and personal brain function improve with great coaching. It’s gratifying to see that good scientific studies validate these interrelationships — because this is what we’ve been doing.

The Link Between Transformational Leadership & Positive Deviants

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

This post is from Transformational Leadership for the Rest of Us by William Seidman, Ph.D. & Michael McCauley, part of our collection of Executive Operations articles about using the latest science to integrate human support and persuasive technology to produce extraordinary performance.

A transformational leader, usually in conjunction with an executive team, creates a vision for success. This person is an enthusiastic, self-confident proponent of change whose personality and actions influence people to behave in ways that drive substantive performance improvement. They create and communicate compelling visions for the future that inspire large numbers of people to function at higher levels than previously imagined.

Here are a few tips to generate the impact of transformational leadership without relying solely on a transformational leader:

Identify and Leverage Your Positive Deviants

Positive Deviants can perform many of the functions of a transformational leader. The organization’s positive deviants can create and articulate passion for a change in a way that energizes others.

How do they do this? Positive deviants love what they do. Underlying this love is usually an unarticulated commitment to a greater social good. Positive deviants are passionate about the social good they are creating and can provide a specific definition of the inspirational vision that can align with and supplement the leaders’ vision. The positive deviants can refine the general vision of the non-transformational leader and present it to the organization as an inspirational message about the social good, backed up with an effective means of achieving it. Consequently, these individuals collectively create a passionate vision of success so the leader does not have to be particularly visionary or articulate.

In addition, positive deviants are simply more committed and efficient than others at driving toward their social goals. They concentrate on the specific behaviors that provide the maximum value. Thus, positive deviants continuously model personal drive, frequently discovering new possibilities for performance improvement. Their inherent innovation provides colleagues with significant stimulus for original thinking and improved efficiency.

Who are your positive deviants? Chances are you already know exactly who the positive deviants are in your organization. These are the few people in an organization who consistently and systematically outperform others, even with all of the same resources and limitations. They are often highly respected for their energy, excitement and effectiveness.

Use Fair Process to Promote Engagement

People respond better to a change when they are treated with honor and dignity during the change process. When an organization gives its people a genuine opportunity to achieve the positive deviants’ social good, people often feel that they are being honored by the organization’s faith in their ability to contribute and they embrace the desired change.

The impact of fair process on motivation is magnified when people envision themselves as being as well respected and effective as the positive deviants. This form of visualization releases neurotransmitters similar to endorphins that create a sense of well-being and increase people’s willingness and ability to learn. People are motivated to embrace a change because it is the right thing to do.

The positive deviant social good, if presented with fair process and positive visualization accomplishes many of the motivational impacts of a transformational leader. All that is needed from the leader is the willingness to have the positive deviants articulate their social good and to have others interact with the social good in this rather unconventional way. The system creates the same motivation, or more, than the leader.

Allow Time to Practice the New Capability

There is no Twitter version of change. Change always takes time and practice. Patience and support by the organization for the practice gives personnel the time and opportunity required to learn something new, and become really good at it.

This is also consistent with the research on how human brains process information. The key principle of learning is “neurons that fire together wire together,” which occurs when people practice the new capabilities. Conscious practice alone can creates many of the impacts of transformational leadership.


What Motivates Us? Some Surprises about Money — and Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

By Rick Grbavac

Watch this great little film by RSA Animate, adapted from a talk given by Daniel Pink, author of Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us.  Pink’s point is that our previous ideas about what motivates people to greatness are only partially correct.  If performance involves mechanical tasks, more money does work to improve performance.  But as soon as there is any cognitive skill involved, more money as incentive actually works in reverse. 

Three factors lead to better performance: Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose.  Giving people a chance to be responsible and perform their jobs without undue oversight is the first factor to enabling people to seek better performance.  People enjoy a challenge; when given an opportunity to improve their performance in a way that increases their self respect, they are willing and able to improve.  Finally,  people want to make a difference.  If they feel that their jobs have a higher purpose, they enjoy their work more and perform at a higher level. 

These three factors are closely related to the qualities of the positive deviants in your organization.  PDs tend to operate without much management support (or interference).  They consistently look to improve their skills and capabilities. And they conceive of their jobs in higher moral terms, causing them to do different and more successful things.

Factors for motivation = the qualities of positive deviants.  Every manager’s dream is to have a self-directed, motivated workforce.  This is what we do with our clients.

Getting Even Better at Providing “Better Health for Everyone at Less Cost”

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

By William Seidman

We at Cerebyte are excited to be partnering with CHOICE Regional Health Network  to help this dynamic organization identify the best practices of hospital and social service case managers in Washington. Oregon, and Ohio – while also protecting the interests of hospitals, care providers, social service agencies, and communities.

CHOICE’s vision is “better health for everyone at less cost,” and it describes itself as “a non-profit coalition of rural and urban hospitals, practitioners, public health clinics, community health centers, behavioral health providers, and other partners dedicated to improving the health of our community.”

We’ll be focusing on coordinated care and using our patented TRANSFORM process for wisdom discovery  and, then, training of CHOICE’s case managers. I hope to report here on the steps we’ll be taking as we work with CHOICE.

When Same-Old, Same-Old Needs a Transformation: Changing Company Culture

Monday, March 15th, 2010

By William Seidman

I’m working with a group of very competent, smart managers now. I’m coaching them to unlearn certain practices that, frankly, aren’t working anymore.

Our challenge: to change the culture of the company from one that fills orders and generally meets customer expectations — a transactional approach — into one that anticipates future needs and can propose new and creative solutions that please customers and energize managers. (And can still fill those orders!)  This new approach can be called transformational.

While the managers I’m working with may talk about making the organization transformational, like so many of us they tend to return to their comfort zone and stick with same-old, same-old business processes that are fundamentally transactional.

They’re constantly surprised when they don’t achieve their objectives.

Do you want your company to merely meet needs — or to be a vitally important resource?

Fortunately, these managers are learning the Cerebyte approach and to think and to function like positive deviants –  transformationally. We coach managers to think like their best positive deviants: that’s where the creativity is.

Managers who are empowered to think freshly are happier and more productive. We know that fresh thinking is an art and a craft that can be taught and learned.

 
Better Tag Cloud