Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for the ‘positive leadership’ Category

Take the Guesswork Out of New Hire Success

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

By William Seidman

New hire success is essential to an organization, and needn’t be a “fingers crossed” process. A single and unified experience, which we at Cerebyte have developed – and use in the real world – ensures success. Our model has four key parts:

  1. Set the Bar for the New Hire
  2. Motivate the New Hire
  3. Sustain the New Hire’s Learning
  4. Scale for Rapid Growth

The order of these experiences is a significant departure from other training approaches. Most classes and OJT training jump straight to functional knowledge, focusing on the mechanics of the job without enough real context.  Instead, we use your positive deviants to help create context and understanding of the new hire’s role.

Begin by Setting the Bar:

Your proven, identified experts, your positive deviants,  can define the content, the best sequence, and approach for learning the material for any new hire.  Ask your positive deviants:

  • In a classroom, what would you teach someone about being a great new hire?
  • What of this would you have a manager or coach reinforce immediately after the class?
  • What additional, higher-order learning would you want the coaches to teach once the basics are established?

The results of this process, which usually takes between one and three days, are incredibly consistent, regardless of the industry. The classroom environment includes connecting the new hire’s role to the larger purpose of the organization, basic background information, and basic process and procedural information. You want your new hire to have a solid theoretical foundation for doing the job well. The OJT (on the job) portions take that theoretical foundation and systematically ensure that learning is applied, leading to an employee who, despite lacking experience with your organization, has excellent capabilities.

I’ll be describe the rest of the process: motivating, sustaining, and scaling for growth, here in the coming days.

Kotter’s 8 Steps to Real and Lasting Organizational Change

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

By William Seidman

It’s amazing to me how much insight into today’s organizations’ problems retired Harvard professor John Kotter had nearly fifteen years ago, when he published “Leading Change: Why Transformational Efforts Fail.” Looked at it another way – how little things have changed.  One of Kotter’s most important points is that transformation is a process, not an event.

Kotter lists the biggest errors organizations make, and then the antidotes – his 8 steps to successful change.

  1. Create urgency
  2. Form a powerful guiding coalition
  3. Create a vision for change
  4. Communicate the vision
  5. Empower others to act on the vision by removing obstacles
  6. Create short-term wins
  7. Don’t declare victory too early; build on the change
  8. Anchor the changes in corporate culture

We’re very much in line with Kotter’s approach, and benefit from the addition of recent breakthroughs in the neuroscience of learning. The leaders we work with understand these now-classic 8 Steps to Change,  but managers have a harder time with them.  It’s our challenge to convey the importance of each step.

The Difference Between Management and Leadership

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

By William Seidman

John Kotter’s now-classic article, “What Leaders Really Do,” was published by the Harvard Business Review some years ago. Its message rang true then, and it does today. Kotter makes the distinction between leadership and management: leadership is about guiding an organization through change. Management, on the other hand, is about facilitating and inspiring the daily efficient execution of the change. Organizations need both but, in a misguided effort, spend most of their time and energy on management. The need for great leadership, and for support of great leaders, is often given short shrift.

At Cerebyte we’ve noticed a decline in leadership during the recession – as if people are fearful of making a change, and so are almost hiding.  As understandable as this response might be, it’s of little use to organizations; in fact it dooms them.

Our work seeks to support and reinforce leadership so that, during this recession and beyond it, companies and organizations can thrive.

Answering Some Thoughtful Questions from Management Consultant Robert Morris

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

By William Seidman

I was recently interviewed by management consultant Robert Morris. Our conversation was posted on the  First Friday Book Synopsis,  part of ”The Employee Engagement Network.” I’ll be sharing some of the highlights (some edited for brevity) here.

Today: What I know now that I wish I’d known when I founded Cerebyte, the major challenges our clients face, and the difference between leadership and management..

Morris: What do you know now that you wish you had known when you founded Cerebyte?

Seidman: Our most valuable insight is this: how hard it is to establish an innovative product and process even if everyone says they want it and even if it has incredibly strong proof points to support it. More specifically, we thought there would be an openness to innovation in the area of performance improvement because almost every organization talked about the need to improve performance and there was widespread agreement about the ineffectiveness of the available approaches (e.g. training classes) at improving performance. However, there was actually a tremendous amount of resistance to change, even if everyone thought it was a good thing to do. It was only when the science actually caught up with what we had been doing, and became widely accepted that the resistance to change decreased.

Morris: Although there is great diversity among Cerebyte clients, in terms of both size and nature of business, which major challenge do all of them face? How specifically does Cerebyte help them to respond effectively to that challenge?

Seidman: They are serious about making the changes in their organization required to significantly improve performance, usually in a particular focus area. In many cases, it is a “change or die” situation for them so motivation and disillusionment with traditional approaches are high. We help organizations improve performance, faster, more completely, more predictably and at less expense than has previously been possible.

Morris: Do you differentiate leadership from management?

Seidman: Yes, though primarily in the leadership programs we develop for our customers. To us, leadership is much more about creating a compelling vision and providing the support and resources that enable the team to achieve the vision (in our terminology, it is about guiding “transformation”) while management is much more about the administration of the business (i.e. “transactions”). We find that this difference is most important when there are significant challenges to the organization. Managers retreat from performance improvements to a survival mode – Did I make my numbers today? -whereas leaders look at the challenges as an opportunity to drive the organization forward, even if it means taking some significant risks.

In addition, we know that “operational excellence,” which is the focus of management, is a subset of leadership —  so if you have great leadership, you get the best of both worlds. It doesn’t work the other way though. Managers, even good ones, literally think differently than great leaders and need extensive education to become leaders.

Four Steps to a More Ethical Organization

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Ethix is an excellent online publication of the Center for Integrity in Business in the School of Business and Economics at Seattle Pacific University. The magazine’s editors provide illustrations of business ethics challenges through positive examples of best practices and exemplary leadership.

We were delighted to share our ideas on creating ethical organizations with readers of “Ethix,” in which our article recently appeared:

FOUR STEPS TO A MORE ETHICAL ORGANIZATION

By William Seidman and Michael McCauley

Do you consider your organization to be ethical? Many organizations have a moral foundation that enables them to make ethically sound decisions even when faced with adverse short-term consequences. However, as has recently been seen on Wall Street and in other places (e.g., Toyota) too many organizations are quick to put immediate economic gain before ethics. While the unethical actions may be expedient, they ultimately contaminate both the employees and the organization. Maintaining high ethical standards is the only way to produce sustainable success.

Do you want your organization to be consistently ethical? Using recent scientific breakthroughs, it is now possible to efficiently enhance the ethics of almost any organization. A simple process of setting a goal and then motivating, sustaining, and scaling ethical behaviors has produced numerous success stories like these:
• Pharmacy managers in a large retail chain think of themselves as “a critical part of the family emergency response system,” going out of their way to ensure that their patients get the correct medicines and care (instead of just selling prescriptions).

• Sales people in an advertising firm that serves small and medium businesses see themselves as “helping customers achieve their personal life goals” (instead of just selling advertising).

So how can an organization create the ethical foundation that inspires this type of response?

1. Set the Bar
First, use your organization’s “positive deviants” to establish a clear, specific standard of ethical values, attitudes and behaviors. Positive deviants are highly respected individuals who are consistent top performers and can typically be identified simply by asking management who stands out. They model the ideal ethical attitudes and best practices all others should achieve and are therefore the primary creators and preservers of an organization’s ethics. Positive deviants are motivated by a commitment to ethically creating a “social good” for their customers and for their organization.

2. Motivate Ethics
Second, guide all personnel to firmly embrace the goal of ethically achieving the positive deviant’s social good. When a positive deviant’s social good, or the inspiration behind their work, is presented to others in an empowering manner, it can be contagious for an organization. It naturally and organically spreads the commitment to the social good, and its ethical foundation, quickly and efficiently.

More specifically, once a strong understanding of the positive deviants’ social good has been established, it can be packaged into a short, emotionally powerful statement that excites and empowers other employees. To be successful, the social good must be presented in a way that creates a sense of honor and dignity (i.e., fair process). It must also cause people to naturally visualize themselves as having the same personal standards and commitment as the positive deviants (i.e., positive visualization). When these occur, people quickly embrace the positive deviants’ perspectives, improving the ethics of the entire organization.

3. Sustain Ethics
Next, ensure that the commitment to ethics is sustainable, even in the face of contrary pressures. True ethical behavior is profound and long term. It is a way of doing business that is so engrained in the organization that people cannot imagine functioning any other way.
The most effective means of generating this depth of commitment comes from the neuroscience principle “neurons that fire together wire together.” All profound learning is a change to the underlying neural structure of the brain that occurs when neurons fire together around consistent concepts. If the concepts are focused around the positive deviant ethics, new learning occurs that can be so complete that people do not even recognize they were ever any other way.

What makes neurons fire together? The key to achieve this organizational depth is simple — practice, practice, practice. Everything the organization does needs to exercise and reinforce the mental commitment to ethics.

4. Scale Ethics
Finally, engage a critical mass of the organization quickly to ensure that ethics pervades all aspects of the organization and becomes a true reflection of the organization as a whole. At the same time, individuals must display ethical behaviors in ways that are unique to their function and personality.

Persuasive technology — technology designed to “change what people believe and do” — that incorporates the principle of mass customization can facilitate widespread commitment to an organization’s ethics. Because this type of technology can touch many people simultaneously, individuals function more ethically and the organization as a whole builds a lasting foundation for ethical behavior.

Contributing to Success
The notion of an ethical organization may seem abstract, yet people who work in an organization with healthy ethics absolutely know it. They love their work, and they ultimately create better, more successful institutions.

Protecting Courageous Leadership in Hard Times

Monday, July 5th, 2010

By William Seidman

Over the past few weeks I’ve been working with positive deviants to develop change leadership best practices within their 3 very different organizations.

Each came up with similar answers to hypothetical and real problems, calling on conventional wisdom of vision, resources, and support.

I asked them if they and their colleagues knew these (since they’re conventional wisdom) and they all did.

I followed up with, “Why is there is such a small amount of good leadership if everyone knows the conventional wisdom?”

The consensus was that the conventional wisdom really does work in good times. It’s easy to create a vision and execute it if there is plenty of cash.

The real test of great leadership takes place during bad times, when pressures are severe.

This reminded me of the great Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter’s remarks on the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment’s freedom of speech protection. He wrote that freedom of speech only really matters when the speech to be protected is completely offensive to you.

Speech that doesn’t offend doesn’t need protection; the same is true for leadership. Leadership matters most during the times when it is most difficult to be a leader, when unpopular decisions (whether to risk, for example, current survival for the possibility of a much better future) must be made.  This courageous leadership — which can be tough to sustain in hard times —  is what we work to nurture and protect.

What Do Positive Deviance, Motivation, The Middle-Aged Brain, and Positive Leadership Have to Do with One Another? Plenty

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

By William Seidman


I’m excited about some of the reading I’ve been doing — in diverse areas — because it reinforces some of the most exciting ideas we’ve been talking about for so long, and working on with our clients.

Daniel Pink’s research on motivation, detailed in his book Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us and Barbara Strauch’s findings, reported in her book The Secret Life of the Grown-Up Brain (hear her “Fresh Air” interview here ) combine nicely with what we know about positive deviance and, also, the impact of positive thinking on positive leadership (Kim Cameron’s Positive Leadership: Strategies for Extraordinary Performance to come together in exciting ways.

Positive deviants are invaluable to organizations.  They are rarely found among the youngest, but often among the middle-aged. It’s hardly a coincidence that Barbara Strauch reports — refreshingly — on good studies that show that while processing speed may decline with age, wisdom and a host of other positive human attributes increase in middle age and continue to increase for many years.

Motivation, Pink shows, is key to improving performance.

Cameron shows that positive thinking enables positive leadership, which in turn improves performance.

Organizational performance and personal brain function improve with great coaching. It’s gratifying to see that good scientific studies validate these interrelationships — because this is what we’ve been doing.

Steps to Courageous Leadership

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

By William Seidman

What are we really recommending when we talk to executives about “courageous leadership”?

Commit to a vision. Believe in your vision  — and the fact that it will require some disruption to achieve –in order to get others to commit to it.  Courageous executives have the courage of their own convictions.

Try new approaches and new ideas. Have the courage to actually allocate resources to learning and becoming good at the new idea. There’s often huge pressure to continue to do the old thing. Willingness to push toward an often undefined outcome is essential to my definition of “courage.”

Wholeheartedly pursue the goal. It’s human nature to fear change. Someone in your organization is likely to resist, and we’ve seen many executives abandon their initiatives as soon as anyone pushes back. This isn’t conviction! Persistence in the face of resistance is essential.

Combine these attributes and you have a courageous, forward-looking executive leading an organization that’s likely to vastly outperform the competition.

ISPI (International Society for Performance Improvement) April Conference

Friday, March 19th, 2010

By William Seidman

The International Society for Performance Improvement  (ISPI) San Francisco  conference is April 19th through the 22nd at the Marriott Marquis.  We’re presenting on  Persuasive Technology  Wednesday, April 21st at 10:30 AM.  The following day, Thursday April 22nd at 8:30 AM, we’ll be talking about the need for Courageous Leadership in Change.   

We went to ISPI last year; it was a great conference and we hope to see you there next month.

When Same-Old, Same-Old Needs a Transformation: Changing Company Culture

Monday, March 15th, 2010

By William Seidman

I’m working with a group of very competent, smart managers now. I’m coaching them to unlearn certain practices that, frankly, aren’t working anymore.

Our challenge: to change the culture of the company from one that fills orders and generally meets customer expectations — a transactional approach — into one that anticipates future needs and can propose new and creative solutions that please customers and energize managers. (And can still fill those orders!)  This new approach can be called transformational.

While the managers I’m working with may talk about making the organization transformational, like so many of us they tend to return to their comfort zone and stick with same-old, same-old business processes that are fundamentally transactional.

They’re constantly surprised when they don’t achieve their objectives.

Do you want your company to merely meet needs — or to be a vitally important resource?

Fortunately, these managers are learning the Cerebyte approach and to think and to function like positive deviants –  transformationally. We coach managers to think like their best positive deviants: that’s where the creativity is.

Managers who are empowered to think freshly are happier and more productive. We know that fresh thinking is an art and a craft that can be taught and learned.

 
Better Tag Cloud