Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Archive for the ‘team learning’ Category

Transform New Hires into Valuable Team Members

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

By William Seidman

Good leaders and managers know that their ability to bring in — and quickly ramp up — new hires is critical for sustained success.  In an economic downturn, efficient and effective new hire development is especially important.  At Cerebyte we have an alternative to the usual methods of either an intense “fire hose” training class or some sort of on the job (OJT) mentoring.

Why did we search for a new method? Because fire hose training gives too much too fast without sufficient context, and on the job training is too random and relies too much on people gleaning meaning from observed actions.

At Cerebyte we’ve developed a process that creates a great blend specifically for new hire development. We’ve tested it and seen it work for our clients. How do we do this?

Based on the expertise of an organization’s positive deviants, we first develop a set of big steps that are coached during a brief and focused classroom setting.

Our persuasive technology provides the class structure; the specific learning activities are led by a facilitator.

The organization’s positive deviants also give us the key items that the manager needs to reinforce. This shows up as a transitional “big step” in the technology and usually 2-4 steps of learning — structured  on the job training —  that drive to greater depth and application.

It takes about three days to create the entire program. The results have been spectacular, cutting ramp-up times by 50% or more, and increasing leaders’ and team members’ stated satisfaction in the training process.

Getting Even Better at Providing “Better Health for Everyone at Less Cost”

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

By William Seidman

We at Cerebyte are excited to be partnering with CHOICE Regional Health Network  to help this dynamic organization identify the best practices of hospital and social service case managers in Washington. Oregon, and Ohio – while also protecting the interests of hospitals, care providers, social service agencies, and communities.

CHOICE’s vision is “better health for everyone at less cost,” and it describes itself as “a non-profit coalition of rural and urban hospitals, practitioners, public health clinics, community health centers, behavioral health providers, and other partners dedicated to improving the health of our community.”

We’ll be focusing on coordinated care and using our patented TRANSFORM process for wisdom discovery  and, then, training of CHOICE’s case managers. I hope to report here on the steps we’ll be taking as we work with CHOICE.

Training for Learning and Real-World Application

Monday, October 12th, 2009

By William Seidman

I’m working in two settings now where there’s a tension between traditional classroom instruction and experiential learning.

Most training organizations like to train, which means classrooms, instructors, and – sometimes -elearning.

Most people prefer to learn, and they learn better when they can immediately apply what they’ve learned.

The art of training is to make classroom content tie tightly to real experience.

The art of experiential learning is to ensure that the right content is learned.

The trainers often want to drive the program, but this really doesn’t work.

Experiential learning is more powerful and effective, though it absolutely needs formal classroom instruction for specific skill building

Most of the people we work with stop talking about training and start talking about “learning activities” that include many forms of experiential learning as well as classrooms and elearning.

This broader definition is a good idea – the best idea - because it leads people to retain what they’ve learned and to be able to apply it to their real world.

Cancer Screening: Reaching Underserved Communities

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

By William Seidman

Cancer screening is a valuable tool for improving the reach of US health care – and yet many communities are underserved. Organizational Resources Group is working with the American Cancer Society (ACS) to remedy this, by building a model using the IdeaNet/Cerebyte approach to successful screening programs.

In the words of ORG, their IdeaNet can “turn strategy into action, close the performance gap, standardize best practices, and support effective succession planning.”

Initial results have been positive – and once the model is proven, ORG will work with the ACS to  promote it nationally.

Orgnizational Resources Group will take a leading role in “coaching” community action teams to deploy the American Cancer Society’s colorectal cancer screening program. The potential for saving lives using this IdeaNet/Cerebyte program is awesome.

One-on-One Mentoring versus Team Learning

Monday, March 16th, 2009

By William Seidman

Team learning or mentoring?  We’ve been working with customers in healthcare who are very interested in our research on learning as a team versus the benefits of learning with a mentor. We are asked, specifically, if we would use team coaching - everyone at once – or one-on-one coaching for specific team members?

There is a tradeoff between the two approaches. Team learning, if well-facilitated, can enable great synergy and alignment in the team, but less individual depth.

Group discussions are powerful, but individuals sometimes don’t have to go as deep contentwise, or focus as intensely. On the other hand, individual learning with a mentor can be deeper, but isolated. The group does not necessarily gain from it.

It’s important to articulate your goals, and then use the method that will get you there.

 
Better Tag Cloud