Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Posts Tagged ‘leadership’

The Science of Change Management

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Until  recently, there wasn’t really any reason to think about a distinction between a craft view of change and a scientific model of change. Change management had for so long consisted of a set of conventional “craft” wisdoms that few questioned the approach, even if the accepted wisdoms were minimally effective.

Now, recent advances in four areas of research and the emergence of a new technology are changing this perspective. By combining work on positive deviance, fair process, neuroscience and mass customization into a single change model, and delivering change guidance through persuasive technology, it is possible to ensure that 98% of personnel in an organization embrace a change initiative.

Here is the model that has evolved from the science:

Set-the-Bar
In order to manage change effectively, the organization has to develop a compelling image of the desired end result of the change. Research on positive deviance tells us that the people who consistently and systematically outperform others (the organization’s “positive deviants”):
• Always have these compelling images
• Are easily identified
• Exist in all job categories in all organizations
• Can be interviewed using simple, reliable techniques that gather their “wisdom” quickly and effectively
The science on positive deviant is extremely consistent. By leveraging their positive deviants, all organizations can always, and easily develop the powerful images required to drive change.

Motivate Change
People must be motivated to change. The science of fair process and the neuroscience of positive visualization make motivation highly predictable too. More specifically, by presenting the positive deviant’s powerful images of success in a way that generates a sense of respect and dignity in the organization (fair process), people tend to embrace the change. In fact, they feel deeply honored that the organization so completely believes in their ability. In turn, when people visualize themselves as functioning at the same levels of positive deviants, neuroscience research has shown that there is a release of neurotransmitters that drive a consistent increase in their willingness and ability to learn something new.

Motivation, once more of an art form than a predictable process, is now highly predictable. By creating the right conditions, almost all participants show significantly increased motivation.

Sustain Change
The craft of change management is particularly ineffective at sustaining a performance improvement. Because so much of craft change management is about personal relationships, when the person is no longer present, change efforts consistently falter.

In contrast, the neuroscience principle of “neurons that fire together wire together” and the emergence of persuasive technology provide capabilities that consistently and systematically sustain a change effort. The key to getting neurons to permanently wire together in support of a new business capability is intensive, repetitive practice. The positive deviants tell us the nature and frequency of this practice. Persuasive technology ensures that people actually practice.

Persuasive technology, which is defined as technology that ”changes what people believe and do,” is specifically designed to provide people with the prompts and support required to achieve the levels of practice required for complete internalization of a change. Features like weekly prompts, continuous status reporting to management and other standard features in persuasive technology drive participants to practice enough to achieve the positive deviant level of performance. Thus, sustainability of a change is now grounded in science and technology and is completely predictable.

Scaling Change
The craft of change management problems with sustainability become significantly more acute when hundreds or thousands of people must change to improve performance. How can a crafts person possibly touch these large numbers since change is all due to the individual contact?

Here too recent scientific advances solve the scaling problem. In particular, the integration of the principles of mass customization into persuasive technology provides a scientific methodology for touching many more people, more efficiently than previously thought possible. Mass customization is an organizing system that enables a central organization to mass produce the energy and materials for a change, while treating each person uniquely, thereby increasing personal motivation.

When embedded in persuasive technology, mass customization guides large numbers of users to consistently and systematically embrace the positive deviant images of extraordinary performance.

Comfort with the Craft
If the science of change management is so advanced, why are so few companies using it? The obvious answer is that the people responsible for change management either don’t know about the scientific advances or are themselves practitioners of the craft and are hesitant to acknowledge that their methods are no longereffective. In either case, organizations are put at competitive risk because they are not keeping up with some of the capabilities others are beginning to use.

Positive Deviance: A Key to Great Government?

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

By Michael McCauley 

In her recent column, “How Questions Can Drive Leadership Success“   in the weekly of the National League of Cities , Dr. Barbara Mackoff  posits that asking the right questions can drive municipal leadership success. I couldn’t agree more!

Dr. Mackoff seeks to encourage the use of the wisdom of positive deviants.  Instead of asking,  ”What’s wrong here?”  she suggests that we ask,  ”What do we want more of here?”

How refreshing!

I just finished reading Lee Brower’s   new book, The Brower Quadrant . In it Lee supports  Mackoff’s approach, saying,  “To be true leaders we need to ask different questions. Asking different questions leads us to different answers. Different answers lead us to different, and often better, results.”

Next, Mackoff suggests that we look around and see who is already solving this problem. Again, this is a positive deviance approach. In any organization, there are people who consistently and systematically outperform everyone else. These are the people we should be focusing on. They are the ones that can help us with work through our challenges and adopt the successful behaviors they have made them so successful.

 There are several additional suggestions that Mackoff provides in her column to help determine if the solution defined by the positive deviants is the right one for your particular city and to ensure that we get the most leverage possible.

Superman and Wonder Woman Need Not Apply: Make Your Organization Easier to Lead

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

By William Seidman

What makes a leader great?  Do organizations unwittingly reinforce stereotypes (gender, age, or other) when they insist on a superhero at the top?

Can organizations excel at what they do without a “charismatic” leader?

I’ve been reading Transformational Leadership  by the late Bernard Bass and organizational psychologist Ronald Riggio, and I’ve had some great conversations recently with Patti Dragland of Strategic Sense  and Lynn Miller from The Center for Creative Leadership.

Patti and Lynn have great ideas and programs on how to be a leader, including expectations for what it takes to be an extraordinary leader — very much the charismatic superhero.

The consensus is that leaders have to create vision, engage people, build teams, inspire, and set by example.

But people can’t be all of these things, even with the best training and coaching. The charismatic, “superhero” model can be as limiting as any stereotype. There are people out there who are smart, creative and inspirational,  but may not fit the superhero mold.

Suppose that we could lower the threshold of leadership by focusing on making the organization more agile and responsive? This is what is meant by “Be the Change,” and it’s a challenging idea that can lead to good organizations becoming great.

Leaders would not have to be superheroes if their organizations were easier to lead.

This what Cerebyte does: it helps organizations to become more agile and responsive so that leaders can be great, whether or not they’re superheroes.

Upcoming Leadership and Performance Improvement Conferences

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

By William Seidman

Several interesting conferences are coming up, and I’m going:

My first stop is Friday, April 17th in Chicago for the Transformational Leadership Gala sponsored by the good folks at the Wright Institute for Transformational Leadership.

The main speaker will be Brad Anderson,  CEO of Best Buy.

Should be very interesting. 300 people are expected - all involved with leadership.

My next stop is the International Society for Performance Improvement (ISPI) Annual Meeting  in Orlando.

I am presenting Monday,  April 20th on Organizational Change in Multi-National, Multi-Cultural Organizations, and on Wednesday April 22nd on The Science of Organizational Change.

ISPI is mostly for people responsible for changing organizations,  and there are always lots of good conversations there.

It should be a great week and weekend!

Social Intelligence and the Biology of Leadership

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

By William Seidman

Daniel Goleman is a cochair of the Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations, based at Rutgers’ Grad School of Applied and Professional Psychology. Richard Boyatzis is the H.R. Horvitz Chair of Family Business and a prof. in the depts of organizational behavior, psychology, and cognitive science at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. They are authors of a great article, “Social Intelligence and the Biology of Leadership,” in HBR this month. You can link to a video interview with Goleman there.

Some of what’s in the article:

  • the role of mirror neurons in creating empathy between leaders ond others
  • the importance of a positive attitude
  • the important of being encouraging
  • an example of how an executive was coached into being a great leader

I’ve seen this in action, and seen it succeed.

Transforming Good Managers into Leaders

Friday, August 15th, 2008

 

Bill and the Japanese team

Bill and the Japanese team

By William Seidman

How do we transform an organization’s good managers into real leaders? I’ve done this in East Asia, South America, and the UK. Now I’m in Japan. We’re doing these sessions in Japanese and English with a lot of translation since (unfortunately) I can say only “good morning” and “thank you.”

But teaching leadership turned out to be a real challenge. The concepts underlying great leadership are more abstract than a typical best practice, and their meaning in Japanese culture is different than in US culture.In addition, 80% of the conversation had been in Japanese. The team identified “self-awareness” as one aspect of being a great leader using a Japanese word that does not have an English equivalent. For most of the sessions I was not able to really guide the system.

But the group, having pretty quickly figured out the discovery process, took over and began to manage it themselves. There would be intense discussions in Japanese and then, “Bill, enter this in the system.” The group became self-facilitating, which is very cool and all I could have hoped for.
Worth reading: “Japan: Doing Business in a Unique Culture,” by Kevin Bucknall.

And here’s the Japanese kanji symbol for “self-awareness,” or “jikaku”:

Jikaku - the Kanji symbol for "self-awareness"

Jikaku - the Kanji symbol for "self-awareness"

 
Better Tag Cloud