Follow Us Twitter Link | Email Us email us | 1.888.745.2520

Posts Tagged ‘positive deviance’

In Memory of Jerry Sternin: Real Change Begins on the Inside

Friday, December 19th, 2008

By William Seidman

Jerry Sternin, Brooklyn-born innovator, humanist, and pioneer of Positive Deviance and the Positive Deviance Initiative, died peacefully on December 11th at the age of 70. Visiting Lecturer and Director of the Positive Deviance Initiative at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts, he and his wife, Monique Sternin, had also received a Ford Foundation Grant and a Rockefeller Foundation Grant to study and to further the applications of Positive Deviance.

The Sternins’ work reached back to the work of Marian Zeitlin at Tufts in the 1980’s. Eventually the Sternins would work with communities in Southeast Asia and Africa, helping fight rural malnutrition there. Dozens of international and regional or local nongovernmental organizations (INGOs and NGOs) utilize Positive Deviance-based findings and programs in more than 30 countries.

The truth of Sternin’s findings, and his radical approach to change, was simple enough: Real change begins on the inside - whether a family, a community, or an organization. He studied families and communities and proved that his theory worked. He died just several days before Positive Deviance, and his work to reduce the spread of the hospital-borne staph infection MRSA, was profiled in the New York Times Magazine’s “Year in Ideas” issue.

One of Sternin’s maxims, reported in the Times piece, asks us to solve problems by thinking about how we act, rather than acting upon how we think. We at Cerebyte use this in our coaching and in our assessments of the organizations we are fortunate enough to help. The challenge is to motivate others - the people who are not the positive deviants - to adapt the practices that work, and that have come from within the organization and deserve recognition and, then, adaptation.

The Other Side of Positive Deviance

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

By Michael McCauley

In his new book, Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell looks at the other side of positive deviance. Gladwell asks, How do people become top performers? He attributes success to three factors: hard work, innate ability, and luck.

We in the US may focus too much on innate abiity and not enough on either hard work or luck. How often do we admire a star athlete or a great lecturer and think that it must just come naturally to them?
While ability plays an important role, it is hard work — Gladwell cites the “10,000 hours” one needs before expecting success — that enables positive deviants to exploit their abilities and achieve true success.

The importance of luck is also interesting. Gladwell asserts that some people are just in the right place at the right time. Bill Gates attended Lakeside, a private high school, in Seattle whiich had an active computer club in 1968, earlier than most schools. We all know the rest of the story.

I would posit, though, that many positive deviants create their own “luck,” By staying open to new ideas, networking with peers, and trying different things, they maximize the opportunities they have and thereby the “luck” to which they are exposed.

The balancing of these components — ability, hard work, and luck –makes positive deviant wisdom so valuable. It’s also why organizations must consistently and systematically discover and fuly utilize the wisdom of their own people if they are to remain competitive.

Why Stop at Positive Deviance?

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

By William Seidman

Why stop at positive deviance?
Positive deviants - “star performers” - bring value to any organization. Their knowledge and, often, passion can spread to others and have a marked positive effect. But what’s the value of knowledge that isn’t spread around? Not much. We focus on positive deviants and we find that passionate commitment to a greater social good is a core element of the reason they are PDs.

Capturing the passion and communicating that passion is the key to getting others to initially respond. Finally, for others to really learn and practice the positive deviance content, people have to have a focused set of experiences that cause the new positive deviant knowledge to be internalized.

The Learning Style of Positive Deviants

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

By Michael McCauley

Positive Deviance is usually limited to the domain that’s the focus of a person’s interest and innovation. This doesn’t mean that positive deviants focus on just one thing. Instead, they are always looking for general knowledge that can be used elsewhere - often in their field. They have an intellectual curiousity and continue to learn and grow.

Some of the greatest positive deviants have gained their insights by applying learning from other - related or unrelated - areas to challenges they face in their area of focus. Think about the inventors, the tinkerers, the folks who can do a lot with a little - This “crossdomain” appilication can provide some of the most insightful, and useful, innovation. Wilson Greatbach applied his knowledge of engineering, electronics, and human biology to the problem of heart blockage. The result? His invention of the pacemaker. Marvin Camras trained as an engineer and was motivated to record his cousin singing opera. He ended up inventing magnetic tale recording.

Positive deviants never really know where their next great “ah ha!” moment will come from. They’re observing, thinking, learning - looking for new ideas that just might come in handy.

 
Better Tag Cloud