{"id":5500,"date":"2014-06-03T09:11:44","date_gmt":"2014-06-03T09:11:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cerebyte.com\/?p=5500"},"modified":"2014-06-03T09:11:44","modified_gmt":"2014-06-03T09:11:44","slug":"learn-from-ge-how-not-to-approach-mid-career-development","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cerebyte.com\/2014\/06\/03\/learn-from-ge-how-not-to-approach-mid-career-development\/","title":{"rendered":"Learn from GE: How not to approach mid-career development"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\t\"training\"<\/a>\n\nI read this post \u201cHow GE Trains More Experienced Employees<\/a>\u201d with great interest.\n\nFocusing on \u201cmid-career\u201d development is a useful and important topic. Very little attention has been paid to mid-career development, whether the people in question are new hires or long-time employees within a given organization.\n\nHowever, the lessons outlined in the post are weak and present a typical \u201ccorporate\u201d perspective of \u201cdevelopment.\u201d They offer little insight into how these more experienced people learn, or how the new neuroscience of learning changes leadership development.\n\nFrom our more than 15 years of experience in improving organizational performance, much of which was grooming mid-career personnel\u2014both new hires and long-time employees\u2014it\u2019s clear that mid-career personnel think and learn differently than less experienced people.\n\nMid-career personnel are:\n\n\n